Q&A: Board Influence Over Renters

Business legal document concept : Pen and glasses on a rental agreement form.

Q. How much influence does a co-op board have over which tenants a holder of unsold shares (HUS) can rent their units to? Can a board enact a bylaw requiring board review and approval of tenants, or set specific financial requirements they must meet? 

                                  —Seeking Clarification

A. “Co-op boards frequently raise concerns about how to manage rental activity by Holders of Unsold Shares (HUS), especially as it relates to their rental practices and how they may impact the character or stability of the building,” says Marc Schneider, CEO and managing partner of Schneider Buchel LLP, a law firm representing community associations throughout NY State. 

 When it comes to setting certain financial criteria, Schneider notes, boards must understand the law in order to avoid illegal discrimination and potential liability. “First, under New York State and New York City law, ‘lawful source of income’is a protected class. That means a co-op, including the HUS who is renting their units, cannot create policies or governing document provisions that single out Section 8 applicants, for example, impose additional approval requirements that apply only to them, or make it such that they will essentially be prohibited from renting an apartment. If this was done, it would be considered discrimination that would subject the Board and HUS to liability (which could include personal liability).

 “That said, boards are fully entitled to enforce their proprietary lease, house rules, and any obligations. All tenants, including those of a HUS, must adhere to those rules and governing document provisions, and the co-op still has the normal enforcement tools. While a board typically can’t deny a HUS the right to rent their apartment, they can impose reasonable neutral, uniformly applied policies that govern the conduct of all tenants in the building as long as those rules apply equally to every resident situation. Note, however, there are certain things that cannot be done to a HUS (depending on what is in the Offering Plan and governing document provisions regarding the HUS’ rights), so you should consult with your building’s attorneys before you enact or change any rules which will affect the HUS.

 “If a HUS rents to tenants who violate building rules or create disturbances, the board can take action the same way it would with any other shareholder’s tenant, including issuing default notices or seeking legal remedies if necessary against both the subtenant and the HUS. What the board cannot do is regulate or restrict rentals based on the tenant’s participation in a government assistance program.”

Related Articles

A hand presents an eviction notice isolated in flat design style (cut out)

Q&A: Co-op Tenant Evicted

Q&A: Co-op Tenant Evicted

Divided house and wooden gavel. Division of real estate in case of divorce or inheritance.

Q&A: Tenant Obligations During Foreclosure

Q&A: Tenant Obligations During Foreclosure

Shanghai,China-March 14th 2024: Airbnb, Booking.com and Vrbo app icons. Assorted online rental company brands

Q&A: Airbnb Rental = Sublet?

Q&A: Airbnb Rental = Sublet?

Q&A: Moving in Mom

Q&A: Moving in Mom

Q&A: Moving in Mom

A hand presents an eviction notice isolated in flat design style (cut out)

Q&A: Forcing Out Co-op Sublease Tenants

Q&A: Forcing Out Co-op Sublease Tenants

Q&A: Lease Rights

Q&A: Lease Rights

Q&A: Lease Rights

 

Comments

  • What is the legal rule regarding the following situation: A coop,owner was approved to buy the coop,apt next door to combine both apts. One year later,the coop owner placed one of the apartments online in order to sublet. The bd is. split on whether he should be allowed to do this. Some members feel that the purchase was approved for the sole purpose of combining and therefore the apartment is one unit now. These bd members feel that they would not have approved the purchase separately as the bd does not allow purchases for investments. The other bd members say let him do it, he didn’t know the rules . Who is right?