Q&A: Do Unenforced Bylaws Become Void?

What Are The Rules? on chalkboard

Q. If the particular bylaws of a condo community are continuously not followed, does the bylaw that is continuously misused become a LEGAL bylaw? Do we have any legal precedence here?

                       —Concerned in Chelsea

A. “The bylaws of a condominium are a legal document and are an exhibit to the Declaration of Condominium,” says Eric M. Goidel, a senior partner with the Manhattan-based law firm of Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C. “The Declaration is the instrument which forms the condominium and is recorded in the real property records of the county in which the condominium is formed. In New York City, the Declaration is filed with the New York City Register. Bylaws can only be amended by requisite vote of the unit owners. Typically an amendment requires a supermajority vote of the common interest (and on occasions also a supermajority of all units) in the condominium. The fact that a Board of Managers has ‘not followed’ a particular bylaw provision does not serve to void that provision. Nor does it mean that a practice of the Board of Managers taking some action contrary to the bylaw provision would somehow make that practice legal.”

Related Articles

Hand with a magnifying glass to search for important documents vector

Amending Your Governing Documents

Why, When, & How to Make Changes

New rules alarm message on a wooden desk in a bright indoor environment

Amending Bylaws and House Rules

When & Why

Law, legal judgement, legistration, litigation, court verdict, judicial system and civil right and social justice concept with judge gavel on law textbook in attorney law firm, lawyer business office

Laws vs. Bylaws

Statutes, Governing Docs, & the Role of the Board

The Importance of Governing Document Literacy

The Importance of Governing Document Literacy

Co-op-Condo-HOA Instructions Included

Symbol badge for pet animals not allowed zone

Are No-Pets Policies a Thing of the Past?

Reasonable Accommodations vs. Board Rules

Tiny people getting paper sheet with fine flat vector illustration. Cartoon characters paying traffic bill, municipal tax or parking fee as penalty from police. Financial mulct or punishment concept

Q&A: Not Fine with Fines

Q&A: Not Fine with Fines

 

4 Comments

  • I own shares in a coop. The by-laws say to be on the board you have to own shares. It also says, to be the board president you must be a board member. The president of our board, W, transferred his shares to a trust FOUR months before he was elected president of the board. W should have NEVER been president of the board because he should have resigned months before the election. I found out that W transferred his shares by searching county records. I have written W and the rest of the board and have received no response. Are there criminal charges I can file against W and possibly the rest of the board for their failure to act?
  • If W is the trustee of said trust, then he is still a shareholder, making him eligible to be a board member.
  • Can board members define the ballot for the annual board election? We have a 7 person board with one year terms not staggered. Two people are not seeking re-election before the next coming election. The board conducted interviews for what they called the 2 open positions. There were 4 applicants and two were placed on the ballot along with the 5 sitting board members. The other two were told thanks but your application was not accepted. It seems like a conflict of interest for board members seeking re-election to have the ability to restrict who runs against them. Why shouldn't there just be 9 candidates vying for the 7 positions? The by-laws say nothing about the board deciding who appears on the ballot.
  • Can board members define the ballot for the annual board election? We have a 7 person board with one year terms not staggered. Two people are not seeking re-election before the next coming election. The board conducted interviews for what they called the 2 open positions. There were 4 applicants and two were placed on the ballot along with the 5 sitting board members. The other two were told thanks but your application was not accepted. It seems like a conflict of interest for board members seeking re-election to have the ability to restrict who runs against them. Why shouldn't there just be 9 candidates vying for the 7 positions? The by-laws say nothing about the board deciding who appears on the ballot.