An Unusual Assessment Mitigating Losses from Casualties

An Unusual Assessment

 A recent federal appeals court decision on the subject of income tax law stands  to be of great benefit to cooperative corporations around the city,  particularly in light of damage suffered in many buildings from Hurricane  Sandy. Alphonso v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 708 F.3d 344 (2d Cir.  2013).  

 Alphonso involved the Castle Village apartment complex, which includes 589  apartments in five twelve-to-fifteen-story buildings situated on approximately  seven acres in Manhattan on the eastern bank of the Hudson River overlooking  Riverside Drive and the Henry Hudson Parkway. The grounds are a landscaped  private park, featuring benches, garden paths and a children’s playground among other amenities.  

 On May 12, 2005, a retaining wall structure, approximately 70 feet high and 250  wide, which held the grounds in place over Riverside Drive and the parkway,  suddenly collapsed, spilling soil and rock over all lanes of the Henry Hudson  Parkway, causing significant damage. The collapse blocked the parkway,  attracting considerable attention in the media.  

 Exercising its contractual rights, Castle Village assessed all of its  tenant-shareholders the cost, beyond insurance coverage, of repair and  clean-up.  

 On their personal income tax returns, the tenant-shareholders took “casualty losses” for the amounts they contributed. A casualty loss is a tax deduction that  individual taxpayers are permitted for non-business “losses of property … if such losses arise from fire, storm, shipwreck, or other casualty, or from  theft.”  

 Deductions Denied

 The IRS disallowed the tenant-shareholders’ deductions, and the Alphonso case, which was brought in the United States Tax  Court, became a test case for whether the deduction would be permitted to all  of the tenant-shareholders.

 The Tax Court ruled in favor of the IRS and denied the deduction. Its reasoning  was that the grounds of the cooperative complex, constituting the property that  was damaged, were not owned by the tenant-shareholders, but rather by the  cooperative corporation itself, and the tenant-shareholders’ leasehold interests covered their own apartments but not the grounds.  Therefore, the Tax Court ruled, the tenant-shareholders themselves did not have  a sufficient “property interest” in the grounds to support the deduction.  

 On this reasoning, the cooperative corporation itself would be able to take the  deduction but, as is typical, it would not have had taxable income enabling it  to use the deduction. Typically, cooperative corporations charge their  tenant-shareholders rent (called “maintenance”) measured by their “cash requirements,” so that, by definition, the corporation will generally not have taxable income.  Therefore, the deduction would be wasted if it could not be taken by the  tenant-shareholders, rather than by the corporation.  

 On appeal, the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit reversed the Tax Court,  ruling in favor of the taxpayer (and, by extension, all of the  tenant-shareholders). The Second Circuit held, in sum, that the proprietary  lease of Castle Village, as augmented by its “house rules,” which were attached to the lease, gave tenant-shareholders “the right to use the Castle Village grounds.” Although this right was “not exclusive with respect to [the taxpayer’s] fellow tenants,” since it was part of the leasehold interest of tenant-shareholders and was “shared with other residents of Castle Village and their respective guests but  not with anyone else,” it was a “property interest” in the grounds, supporting a casualty loss deduction.  

 The Alphonso case is not yet finished. The appeals court remanded the case back  to the Tax Court for further proceedings on the subject of whether the collapse  of the retaining wall was the result of a “casualty,” another element that must be proven to obtain the deduction.  


 The case is of great significance, especially in light of Hurricane Sandy.  Particularly in coastal areas, numerous cooperative buildings were damaged in  the superstorm. Most typically, the damage was to lobbies on ground floors and  basement spaces used for storage and laundry rooms. Apartments on upper floors  tended to suffer less damage. The lobby and basement space in a cooperative,  like the grounds in Castle Village, are owned by the cooperative corporations,  not by the tenant-shareholders. Typically, tenant-shareholders have the right  to use this space in common with their fellow shareholders, but to the  exclusion of the general public. Under the authority of the Alfonso case,  hurricane damage to this type of space that is not covered by insurance may  well support a casualty loss tax deduction for the tenant-shareholders.  

 Cooperatives and their counsel should look at this issue carefully to see  whether some part of the damage from Hurricane Sandy or other catastrophic  events might be recoverable through this use of the Alfonso decision.  

 Eric B. Levine is a member of the firm of Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP and represented the taxpayer on the appeal in the Alfonso case.


Related Articles

Taking Flight to Florida?

Taking Flight to Florida?

Hit Hard by Trump Tax Plan, NY Homeowners Look to the Sunshine State

Refusal to provide housing. Bank refuse to give a mortgage loan. Low credit score. Confiscation of pledged property. Building commissioning. Building codes. Cancellation of deal buying real estate

Proposed Law Would Require Co-ops to Give Reasons for Denials

More Transparency for Buyers, Possible Liability for Boards

Red neon sign of "No Vacancy" at night

Short-Term Rental Registration Law Curbs Airbnb

Local Law 18 Protects Residents, Visitors Alike