Watch Your Language Carefully Drafting Contracts Protects Boards

Watch Your Language

 While the vast majority of one-time projects and long-term service contracts  involving vendors and service providers and their co-op, condominium or HOA  clients go smoothly and either conclude or continue without incident, a small  percentage of jobs do jump the tracks. Sometimes it’s a contractor’s inability to stay on schedule or stick to an agreed-upon budget that does it;  sometimes it’s the quality of work itself that’s not up to par.  

 Whatever the cause, sometimes it’s necessary for management and building administrators to pull the plug on a  contract—and that sometimes can be easier said than done. But before any contracts are signed, experts agree that boards and associations  should make sure that all vendors and service providers are properly licensed  and have a good record with the Better Business Bureau, for more information  log onto Another useful search is your county’s Clerk of Courts office to determine whether the contracting firm or its  principals appear in litigation.  

 Breaking Ties

 There are numerous reasons why a co-op, condominium or HOA manager or board  might feel it necessary to break a contract with a vendor or service provider  but some are more frequent than others.  

 “While there are certain contractual warranties implied at law such as  merchantability or fitness for a particular intended use, a cooperative,  condominium or homeowner’s association would generally have the right to terminate a contract for work or  services based upon the breach of a particular provision of a contract,” says Eric Goidel, a partner in the Manhattan-based law firm of Borah Goldstein  Altschuler Nahins & Goidel, P.C. “Dependent upon the type of contract (construction or service) such grounds could  include failure to perform pursuant to specifications, the failure to deliver  materials, the failure to adequately staff or timely perform the work and the  failure to timely respond to service calls.”  

 “Any breach of any material terms of the agreement is the primary reason for a  condo or HOA to feel it necessary to break a contract,” adds Eric Frizzell, a partner with the Glen Rock, New Jersey-based law firm of  Buckalew Frizzell & Crevina, LLP, who is also licensed in New York. “Failure to perform services properly, failure to be on-site during required  periods, failure to respond within required time frames on a service contract.  For example, an elevator service contract requires the service company to  respond to a report or a complaint within a time frame and failure to respond  promptly can be a detriment to the building, especially in a high-rise. Other  reasons could be misconduct by workers directed toward homeowners, any type of  inappropriate conduct or alcohol on the premises during work hours. There could  be all sorts of reasons.”  

 “The most legitimate reason for a board or HOA to terminate a contract would be  that the contractor or vendor is breaching the contract by failing to comply  with the plans and specifications and requirements of the contract,” says Michael T. Reilly, an associate with the law firm of Norris McLaughlin & Marcus, PA in New York City. “Additionally, violating city, state and federal codes, ordinances and safety  standards are also additional reasons, which can create dangerous conditions  and potentially put the building and residents at risk.”  

 Writing the Contract

 The association should decide what it wants to accomplish in a contract, and to  be sure everything is included. In negotiating and writing a contract, an  association board should rely on advice from its manager and management  company, attorney, and design consultants—but the board makes the ultimate decision on the terms to which it will agree.  

 “It is significant to make certain that there is a tight contract which sets  forth the parameters and benchmarks for performance,” says Goidel. “It's difficult to break a contract if you cannot specifically point to a breach.  For major construction projects, one should always stay ahead of the contractor  with respect to money. This will often ensure adherence to terms. For major  construction contracts, an independent party should be retained such as an  architect, engineer or specialty consultant, who will be the arbiter of whether  there has been performance. There should be penalties built into the contract  for non-performance or non-responsiveness. Large construction contracts may  include a request that a contractor obtain a payment and performance bond.  While the cost of such a bond can run in the neighborhood of three to five  percent of construction costs, it is often an expense well spent.”  

 “Too often associations will enter into contracts without having their attorney  review them and the contracts will fail to adequately specify what the  contractor is going to do,” says Frizzell. “One instance where this arises, a contractor will submit a one-page proposal and  the association considers that proposal to be a contract, when in fact it  normally needs to be fleshed out in great detail with regard to services that  are going to be provided, remedies and numerous other provisions, such as  insurance and indemnification.  

 “So two key provisions with any contract, with any contractor or service  provider, are insurance provisions to make sure that they provide proof of  adequate insurance and that they provide an endorsement that names the  association, management company and board as additional insureds,” says Frizzell. “And an additional provision that says in simple terms that if the contractor  breaches the contract or is in violation of any law or is negligent in any way  causing damage to the association or any of the residents, the contractor is  going to fully indemnify the association.”  

 “We try to have our clients enter into license agreements rather than long-term  leasehold arrangements because they’re more ready terminable,” says David L. Berkey, a managing partner with the law firm of Gallet Dreyer & Berkey, LLP in New York City. “If you don’t want to do either of those two, you are probably best off not dealing with  that particular vendor.”  

 Here are a few additional elements real estate experts believe that an  association should seek to include when writing a contract:  

 • Termination for no cause, which could occur if the association board decides to  get rid of a contractor it doesn’t like, if a new board or management company wants to replace the contractor  with another it prefers, or if the board elects not to complete a project that  is already underway. Then the association must pay the contractor for all costs  and expenses he incurred prior to the termination.  

 • A default clause, which allows the association to cancel the contract if the  contractor doesn’t cure a default within a specified time after notice by the association. The  time to cancellation may be five, 10, or 30 days.  

 • A description of the work to be done, including a comprehensive scope of work  statement, and a schedule of values containing a complete breakdown of  quantities of materials and labor and their associated costs.  

 • A schedule that specifies three dates: when the work will begin, substantial  completion, and final completion.  

 If Problems Arise

 Frizzell believes that if a contract dispute develops the board should first  attempt to work things out with the contractor. “If there is a problem you want to sit down as soon as possible with the  contractor and review your areas of concern. You definitely want to try to work  things out,” he says, “You also want to be careful to not make a statement that is inadvertently  prejudicial to the association in the event, you can’t work things out and it ends up in litigation. Sometimes, people may be afraid  of confrontation so they minimize what their concerns are. They may make a  statement like ‘this really isn’t a major issue,’ or something along those lines. You don’t want to make those types of statements. You also want to get your attorney  involved, earlier rather than later.”  

 “If a dispute develops it should try to be resolved without going to court,” says Goidel. “Litigation of any type will be costly to both sides and dependent upon the issue  in dispute, it might ultimately prove a situation where you win the battle but  financially, lose the war. All disputes or alleged breaches should be  documented in writing and then communicated to the contractor or service  provider. It is difficult to win a case where there is a lack of a proper paper  trail. Adherence to mechanisms set forth in the contract for terminating the  agreement or for pursuing dispute resolution must be adhered to,” he says.  

 Contracts can provide for mediation and perhaps arbitration of disputes as  opposed to litigation. Mediation, if necessary followed by arbitration, is  generally a less-costly and speedier process. The major distinction between  mediation and litigation is that once the arbitrator’s decision is handed down, it is non-appealable. One benefit of arbitration is  that the arbitrator is generally more knowledgeable about the matter than a  judge.”  

 Most Contentious Contracts

 Certain types of repairs and services are prone to contract disputes,  construction-law attorneys say. Roofing jobs, concrete restoration and  replacement of windows and sliding glass doors are known to generate disputes,  as well as landscape maintenance and solid-waste collection.  

 “I think that there’s a greater chance for disagreements about whether the services are being  properly performed,” adds Frizzell. “If someone is supposed to provide you with an A-B-C brand photocopier and that’s in the contract, you either get it or you don’t, the more specific the better. If it’s a materials contract it’s easy to confirm if you received the materials you ordered, but if it’s a services contract and the contract is drawn with terminology that is too  vague that can lead to disagreements.”  

 In closing, dealing with contracts—including extricating your board or association from one that's no longer  meeting your requirements or expectations—boils down to doing your homework beforehand, making your needs and standards  clear (and making sure they make it into the language of the contract) and  involving your legal counsel earlier in the process rather than later.  Following this protocol will not only save you time and headaches, it will save  your building or HOA money in the long run. 

 George Leposky is a freelance writer and a frequent contributor to The  Cooperator. Staff writer Christy Smith-Sloman contributed to this article.  


Related Articles

The Impact of Litigation in Co-ops & Condos

The Impact of Litigation in Co-ops & Condos

Do Lawsuits Damage a Community?

Resolving Conflicts

Resolving Conflicts

What Can Managers Do?

Alternative Dispute Resolution

Alternative Dispute Resolution

What to Do When They Sue – Part II