Q I’ve had a long existing leak in my full bathroom since the shareholders above me
 moved in. It so happens that the shareholders’ son runs a bath for as long as two hours at a time, blasting the water at full
 force. Over time this has caused damage to the pipes and I’ve had recurrent leaks in the bathroom ceiling. An extensive plumbing job was done two
 years ago to replace broken and deteriorated pipes. However, the beginnings of
 yet another leak has surfaced on the ceiling as well as cracks down the wall. I
 was told that there is nothing they can do to prevent my neighbor upstairs from
 taking two-hour baths, or 24-hour baths for that matter, and that their hands
 are tied. Apparently there is no law on record that can be enforced. I live in
 New York. I am at my wits-end with this problem and I keep getting the
 runaround from the managers and superintendent. 
 
              —Wet & Wild 
                     
                    
A “There is no law that specifically addresses how long one may run a bath in New
 York City,” says attorney Andrew B. Freedland of the New York-based law office Rosen
 Livingston & Cholst LLP. “However, this shareholder may have other remedies available to him. Generally,
 any plumbing that is outside of a shareholder’s apartment is the responsibility of the cooperative corporation. The
 cooperative is also responsible for the repair of any walls down to the
 unfinished surface of the sheetrock wall (the shareholder is responsible for
 any painting and/or decorating). The writer should review his own proprietary lease as to its specific
 provisions. If a leak is caused by the negligence of one particular shareholder, the
 cooperative may hold him or her responsible for the cost of any repairs
 necessitated by the shareholder’s negligence. 
 
 “If any significant damage occurs within the writer’s apartment as a result of a leak from the apartment above, he should
 immediately report such damage to his insurance carrier who should reimburse
 the writer for any necessary repairs pursuant to the terms of his policy. The
 insurance carrier may seek subrogation from the neighbor’s insurance carrier. 
 
                     
                    
 “If the writer is being disturbed by the noise created by the running water, the
 writer should first begin by making a record of the nuisance—writing letters to the managing agent stating the disturbance which is being
 created by the neighbors. He should also have one or more third party witnesses verify the existence of
 the noise caused by the neighbor running his bath for excessive periods of
 time. 
 
                     
                            
                    
 “If the disturbance is great enough, the writer may have a nuisance claim or a
 claim for breach of the warranty of habitability against the cooperative.
 Although, the damages which the writer may be awarded, even if the suit is
 successful, may not be great enough to make such a suit worth the time and/or
 expense. Courts in New York, generally, do not favor noise complaints because they
 recognize that disturbances will occur when a large number of people live in a
 compact space. 
 
                     
                    
 “Because shareholders in a cooperative have a landlord-tenant relationship with
 the cooperative corporation, such a suit would be brought against the
 cooperative. Although, before resorting to legal action, I would strongly
 recommend that the writer approach the neighbor and explain the situation and
 the disturbance being created and see if the dispute can be resolved directly
 or through mediation.” 
 
                     
                        
                    
 
                    
         
        
    
Leave a Comment