Q Is a co-op in New York City compelled to have a live-in superintendent? If so, can he be fired if it is proven that his legal residence is in another
 state? Our super is never around and when he is in the area he is usually at
 another building somewhere in the neighborhood. He is engaged to work 20 hours
 per week. The building is dirty and it is hard to get him to do anything. Is
 the co-op obligated to pay for his utilities and health insurance for him and
 his family besides his rent-free apartment? 
 
      —Frustrated Cooperator 
 
                     
                    
A According to Neil Garfinkel and Robert Bergson of the law firm of Abrams
 Garfinkel Margolis Bergson, LLP: “Section 83 of New York’s Multiple Dwelling Law provides that whenever “there are thirteen or more families occupying any multiple dwelling, and the
 owner does not reside therein, there shall be a janitor, housekeeper or some
 other person responsible on behalf of the owner who shall reside in said
 dwelling, or within a dwelling located within a distance of two hundred feet
 from said dwelling, except that where two or three multiple dwellings are
 connected or adjoining, one resident janitor shall be sufficient.” A “multiple dwelling” is a dwelling which is either rented, leased, let or hired out, to be occupied,
 or is occupied as the residence or home of three or more families living 
 
 independently of each other.”’ N.Y. Multiple Dwelling, Law, § 4(7). The Multiple Dwelling Law 
 
                     
                    
 applies to cooperative corporations. 
                     
                            
                    
 “If the cooperative corporation in question falls within the above-cited
 statutory framework, 
 
                     
                    
 then it is required to have a live-in janitor or superintendent. The
 superintendent cannot reside in another state. 
 
                     
                        
                    
 “The circumstances under which the superintendent may be terminated would be
 determined in accordance with the employment relationship between the
 respective parties. The employment contract, if any, between the parties would
 likely set forth the circumstances under which the superintendent may be
 terminated. In addition, the superintendent may be a member of a union, in
 which case the conditions of employment would be determined pursuant to the
 subject collective bargaining agreement. Whether or not the cooperative is
 required to pay for the superintendent’s utilities and health insurance would also be dictated by the employment
 contract and/or the collective bargaining agreement.” 
 
                     
                    
 
                    
         
        
    
Leave a Comment