Pied-à-Terre Tax Resurfaces This Time With Clearer Rules for Co-ops

Pied-à-Terre Tax Resurfaces

Originally proposed in 2014 by Senator Brad Holyman, Senate Bill S44A - or the ‘pied-à-terre tax,’ as it has become known - was introduced to the New York Assembly in January 2019, partly - according to the National Law Review - in response to hedge fund manager Ken Griffin’s record-breaking $238 million condo purchase at 220 Central Park South, the then-latest addition to the multibillionaire’s vast real estate collection. 

The annual property tax surcharge was proposed to help subsidize city services, and would apply to one- to three-family second residences worth $5 million or more, as well as condos or cooperative units with assessed values over $300,000. These secondary residences, known by the French term “pieds-à-terre” (literally “feet on the ground”) are typically owned by out-of-towners or suburbanites who want a place in the city to serve as a commuting crash pad or a home base for occasional weekend visits. The National Law Review notes that a large segment of the pied-à-terre market in New York City is considered ‘luxury’ - high-end co-op and condo apartments located in some of the city’s most sought-after neighborhoods. 

According to projections in a 2017 NYC Housing and Vacancy Survey, the city’s 75,000 such pieds-à-terre would generate an estimated $650 million from the tax annually— the equivalent of $9 billion in bond revenue. The proposed bill did not pass, however. According to the Law Review, its failure has been attributed to several factors: the cumbersome fashion in which the tax was to be imposed on cooperative apartment buildings, the perceived difficulties in determining whether a unit was a “primary” or “secondary” residence; and finally, strong opposition from the New York real estate industry. 

But now that the COVID-19 pandemic and its economic fallout have hit the state with a $14 billion budget deficit—with projections of up to $30 billion by 2022, according to Governor Andrew Cuomo—state legislators are looking to revive the “pied-à-terre” property tax surcharge. In August 2020, Senator Holyman introduced an amendment to Senate Bill S44A that attempts to resolve the co-op taxation issue. The proposed legislation, summarized below, is currently under deliberation by the state legislature. If it passes, Governor Cuomo will be required to cast the final decision to ratify or veto the legislation. 

Senate Bill S44A proposes that cities with populations greater than one million be allowed to impose the following tax surcharges on non-primary residences (or at least those that are not the primary residence of at least one owner of the property or dwelling unit; not the primary residence of a parent or child of at least one owner of the property or dwelling unit; or rented on a full-time basis to a tenant or tenants for whom the property or dwelling unit is their primary residence), beginning on July 1, 2021:

  • One-, two-, or three-family residences with a five-year average market value of $5 million or higher will be subject to a tax of at least 0.5% and up to 4% on the excess market value above $5 million;

  • Residential real property held in condominium ownership with an assessed value of $300,000 or higher will be subject to a tax of at least 10% and up to 13.5% of the excess assessed value above $300,000; and

  • Dwelling units in a property held in cooperative ownership with an assessed value attributable to an individual owner’s percentage interest on a per-unit basis of $300,000 or higher will be subject to a tax of at least 10%, and up to 13.5% of the excess assessed value above $300,000. The additional taxes attributable to each owner will be added to the cooperative apartment corporation to the amount of such taxes otherwise payable by or chargeable to such owner. 

  • The Law Review notes that the assessed value which serves as the basis for how second-home co-ops and condos will be taxed is not the same as their market value. “A condo or co-op unit in New York City with an assessed value of $300,000 will equate to a property with a market valuation greater than $300,000,” the outlet indicates. Therefore, “Potential purchasers and existing owners will need to confirm their unit’s assessed value to determine whether the tax will be applicable if the unit is a second residence.” 

    To view the full text of Senate Bill S44A, visit https://legislation.nysenate.gov/pdf/bills/2019/S44A.

    Related Articles

    Businessman using a tax form to complete individual income tax payment form. Tax day concept.

    NYC Revenue Proposals Target Luxury Co-ops & Condos

    Bills Seek More Equitable Taxation of Real Property

    State Of New York Flag Eps File -New York Flag Vector File

    J-51 Tax Abatement Update Passes NYS Senate & Assembly

    Bill Awaiting Gov. Hochul's Signature

    NY-NJ Metro Area 12th Highest in the Nation for Property Taxes

    NY-NJ Metro Area 12th Highest in the Nation for Property Taxes

    Short Supply + High Values = Tough Going for Homebuyers

    Modern urban living area with couches, fireplace, and large windows overlooking the city

    A Tale of Two Properties

    Trevor Noah, Ivana Trump's Homes Listed for Sale

    Summer vacation journey flat vector illustration. Road trip adventure. Family travelling by car with active rest equipment. Extreme sports accessories on vehicle roof top isolated on beige background

    When Residents Are Away

    Managing the Challenges of Empty Units

    Pied-à-Terre Tax Effort Revived

    Pied-à-Terre Tax Effort Revived

    Lawmakers Eye New York’s Luxury Market Again



    • Once again, Albany seems to have no clue how co-ops work, which is something like 80% of NYC non-rental housing. How would the city know which co-op unit is owner-occupied and which is not? The administrative burden of info collection is high. Does the tax apply only to non-occupied co-op units or also to non-owner-occupied sublet co-op units? And what about shareholders who vacate temporarily for alterations? The actual property tax bill also makes no sense. The co-op property tax effectively (via the co-op maintenance) is shared proportionately among all shareholders, not only the ones who are pied-a-terring. Per NYS law, the co-op cannot assess or pass through the tax charges only to the offending shareholder(s). Implelemtation of the proposed law requires change in NYS BCL and/or co-op governing documents. Otherwise the tax penalizes all co-op shareholders for the actions of their neighbors.