Page 9 - NY Cooperator November 2019
P. 9

COOPERATOR.COM  THE COOPERATOR —  NOVEMBER 2019      9  CALL BARGOLD!   (718) 247-7000  www.bargold.com  Storage4u@bargold.com   41-41 38th Street  Long Island City, NY 11101  We will turn your unused building space into a secure, state-of-the-art   storage facility   FOR FREE  . We will handle everything from start to finish,   and we’ll   PAY YOU   monthly.  A valuable amenity   for residents that   won’t cost you a dime  Our Investment.   Your return.  to  those  living with legally  defined dis-  abilities. The accommodations to be   made  should be such  that  the  disabled   person can enjoy the use of his or her   apartment in the same fashion that some-  one who is not disabled can. In addition,   in a co-op building where there is a land-  lord/tenant relationship, while the board   (comparable in this case to a landlord)   is entitled to shut down the elevator to   make the repairs/replacements, depend-  ing on the terms of the proprietary lease,   that shutdown may entitle the sharehold-  ers (in this case comparable to tenants)   to make a claim for abatement of their   maintenance.” In other words, if a share-  holder can’t make full use of their apart-  ment because of an elevator shutdown –   no matter how necessary that shutdown   may be – they may be able to argue suc-  cessfully for suspending their monthly   maintenance until the lift is back up and   running.    Hakim cautions that notice should be   sent to every resident of a building when   an elevator shutdown is planned, and   that management should make inquiries   to determine which residents may need   assistance. However, it is generally the   responsibility of the disabled shareholder   or unit owner to notify the management   or  board  and  request  a reasonable  ac-  commodation to be made.    “Depending on the nature and scope   of  the  shutdown,”  Hakim  says,  “a co-op   or condominium may be required to pro-  vide alternative housing for disabled resi-  dents. It would depend on the facts – in-  cluding the length of time the elevator is   out of service, the floor on which the dis-  abled resident resides, the building’s fi-  nances, and so forth – but regardless, if a   board is faced with the choice \[between\]   providing reasonable alternative hous-  ing and defending a possible discrimina-  tion claim, we generally recommend they   work with the disabled resident toward   an amicable and reasonable solution.   “We also recommend that when con-  templating major elevator work, \[boards\]   budget accordingly for such likely ac-  commodation requests,” Hakim con-  tinues. That said, however, Hakim adds   that for a board to be obligated to pay   for  accommodating  a  resident  during   an elevator project, the nature and cost   of  the proposed  accommodation must   be reasonable, when factoring in the fi-  nancial wherewithal of the co-op or con-  dominium. For example, some buildings   will pay to rehouse residents off site for   the duration of a project. Others look   to install temporary staircase lifts or to   relocate occupants to building-owned   units on lower floors. Some will pay for   the additional cost of groceries or other   necessities to be delivered or will hire  jor elevator repair/replacement project,  understand and expect that there may be   additional personnel to assist those with  co-op and condominium boards should  requests for accommodations and should   disabilities who elect to remain at home  be proactive and communicative. They  be, at all times before, during, and after   during the project. Different buildings  should reach out to all the occupants and  the bid process and during the pendency   will handle accommodation requests in  determine who, if anyone, will need ac-  different ways, but, according to Hakim,  commodations  and  how  those  can  be  reasonable requests.   the answer remains the same: “Reason-  able accommodations must be made for  all, and do not ignore the issue until it is   those with legally defined disabilities.”    When it comes to something as crucial  nicative and proactive, rather than tight-  – and as potentially disruptive – as a ma-  reasonably made. Open a dialogue with   too late. It’s always better to be commu-  lipped  and  reactive.  Each  board  should   of the work, ready to assist and respond to   n  A J Sidransky is a staff writer/reporter   with The Cooperator and a published novel-  ist. 


































































































   7   8   9   10   11