Page 30 - NY Cooperator Expo April 2019
P. 30

What Does the   Rest of 2019 Hold?   Industry Experts Weigh In  BY MIKE ODENTHAL  TRENDS  2  018 – and the first half of 2019 – have  boards work, and then establishing rules   been anything but dull, from the global  that are focused on the small percentage of   level all the way down to co-op, condo  boards that are problematic inhibits the ac-  and community association communities.  tivities of all those good boards.  While it’s somewhat beyond   The Cooperator’s  scope to opine on geopolitical currents or the  relevancy is reverse mortgages for co-op   latest round of congressional testimonies, we  shares, which have been largely unavailable   reached out to an array of real estate and legal  despite proposed legislation kicking around   professionals across several different markets  for awhile. I’m not sure exactly what the goal   to discuss how the events of 2018 spilled into  of that proposed legislation was, but the issue   2019, as well as what they think the second  itself I think is an important one. The value of   half of 2019 may bring to the multifamily  reverse mortgages—particularly as more and   housing industry.   The Law  David A. Brauner, Counsel with Wind-  els Marx Lane & Mittenford, LLP in New   York City  “Over the past   few years, the New   York  City Council   and New York State   Legislature  have  been attempting to   restrict co-op board   action via legisla-  tion, stemming from   arguments  about  transparency,  and  that  boards should   be mandated to pro-  vide reasons for all their decisions. I think   that would effectively reduce the impact of   the Business Judgment Rule. They’ve also  that can be collected from a third-party pur-  discussed term limits and other related mat-  ters. And while I recognize that there were a  judgment. Section 9(g)(4) of the Illinois   handful of bad instances which triggered the  Condominium  Property  Act  provides that   concern, in my mind effecting legislation of  an association can collect up to six months of   this nature could undermine the ability of a  assessments that came due prior to the initia-  board to effectively function. In particular,  tion of a collection action against the prior   it would make it increasingly difficult to get  owner and which remain outstanding. Sec-  people willing to serve on the board out of  tion 9(g)(5) provides that attorneys’ fees and   fear of exposure to liability, and out of fear  costs incurred by the association to collect   of second-guessing good faith decisions that  from the prior owner can also be collected.   these  people—who are  essentially  volun-  teers—make.  “What overregulation can do is foster a  with the prior owner) can be collected from a   landlord/tenant mentality between board  third-party purchaser, reasoning that Section   members and shareholders, which co-ops  9(g)(5) is merely a ‘notice’ provision, and does   were originally formed to try and overcome.  not actually give the association the ability to   I’m not claiming that’s the intended goal,  demand these amounts. This doesn’t really   but it may be an unintended consequence.  make sense to me. Why have a notice pro-  Sometimes the failure of those with legisla-  tive powers to understand how good co-op  this issue will be further litigated in the near   “The other issue I see having increased   more co-ops have long-time residents whose   economics are unequal to the current value   of their apartments—comes through retain-  ing a diversity of economic status among   co-op membership; they   enable older sharehold-  ers to tap into the equity   of their apartments in   order to continue liv-  ing there, without being   forced to sell. It’s about   allowing people to stay   in their homes, and not   accelerating the dimi-  nution of different eco-  nomic points of view.”  Reginald D. Cloyd   III, an attorney with   with Tressler LLP in Chicago  “A super hot topic right now is the amount   chaser at a judicial sale after a foreclosure   However, various appellate courts have held   that no attorney’s fees and costs (associated   vision if it can’t actually be enforced? Surely   “Smoke-free build-  ings: policy statements   required earlier this   year have inspired   some associations to    review the issue.”      — Steven Wagner   30 THE COOPERATOR   —APRIL 2019   COOPERATOR.COM  See us at Booth 100  www.automaticindustries.com  1-800-THE-WASH  WOMAN OWNED COMPANY   BACKED BY A LOT OF MAN POWER  FAMILY-OWNED SINCE 1971  We offer a boutique style of service  We are compassionate and caring to   our customers   While still being competitive   with the “Big Box” Boyz!   Offering state-of-the-art laundry rooms  See us at Booth 208


































































































   28   29   30   31   32