Page 5 - CooperatorNews NY July 2022
P. 5

COOPERATORNEWS.COM  COOPERATORNEWS —  JULY 2022   5  QUESTIONS & ANSWERS  Legal  Q  A&  “  “  New York’s Property Management   Leader for 40 years  I’ve been a board president for 35 years   and have worked with four different   management firms prior to FirstService   Residential. I can comfortably say   that FirstService has been our best   managing agent, which is why we’ve   kept them in place for 20 years!   -Gerald R., Co-op Board President  Let’s Talk!  |   212.634.5410 LetsTalk.NY@fsresidential.com   |   Rule-Breaking Resident  Q  I live in a senior cooperative  pressure to comply with the house rules,”   with 102 units. Occasionally  says Bruce Cholst, attorney with New   we  have  quality  of  life  issues.  York  City  law  firm  Herrick,  Feinstein.   For instance, someone has been opening  “What’s more, unless your cooperative’s   a window (even in the cold, cold winter!)  proprietary lease or bylaws explicitly au-  and blasting music out, sweeping balcony  thorize imposition of fines for house rule   debris onto the common sidewalk below,  violations, fining is not a legally enforce-  parking in an unauthorized space which  able remedy. (Fining authorization in the   blocks the handicapped ramp, or exces-  sive noise early in the morning.  We initially spoke with the offending  managing agent as the first resort in ap-  resident. When that failed, letters from  proaching a recalcitrant shareholder over   our board and our managing agent also  his rule violations. If that fails, I suggest a   failed.  Our  managing  agent  has  advised  verbal overture by the property manager.   that our only recourse is fining individu-  als who blatantly and deliberately ignore  versation often leads to dialogue which   our rules.  Any suggestions on how to handle this  In this dialogue the property manager   type of resident?                                 —Frustrated Senior  A  “Unfortunately, there is  capricious in making an issue of the vio-  little a board can do, short  lation. This often abates the shareholder’s   of fining or initiation of  underlying resentment and induces com-  litigation to contain the conduct of a re-  calcitrant shareholder who remains im-  pervious to persuasion or peer group   house rules only is insufficient).  “I typically suggest a letter from the   Engaging the shareholder in direct con-  successfully addresses the situation.   should stress that there is a rationale be-  hind the particular rule in question and   explain what it is, thereby demonstrating   that the board is not being arbitrary or   pliance.   “Should the verbal overture fail, I typi-  cally suggest denying the shareholder ac-  cess to building amenities, such as com-  mon recreational facilities. However, this   coercive step should not be taken without  water so that it does not disturb use of the   consulting counsel, as there are legal im-  plications in resorting to this remedy.  “If the shareholder remains recalci-  trant, I would consult the proprietary   lease and bylaws to see if these docu-  ments contain the requisite authority to   impose fines. If they do, I would levy this   sanction. If fining fails, you should con-  sider resorting to litigation.  “In your case, the written overture has  says attorney Jeffrey Reich with the New   apparently failed, so I would have the  York City law firm of Schwartz Sladkus   managing agent proceed with a verbal ap-  proach and then consider the other steps  both the unit owners whose units are   I have suggested.”  Drip, Drip  Q  I have outdoor space that is ac-  cessed by a door from my unit   and with steps leading down to   an outdoor patio and garden. There are   two floors above where the unit owners   or occupants have window air condition-  ers that drip onto my steps and a section   of my outdoor space, making it annoying   to walk down or up the steps.  Who is responsible for diverting the   steps and patio?                                                   —All Wet  A  “The writer refers to the   ‘unit owners or occupants’   living above the writer’s   apartment, indicating that the apartment   is located in a condominium building,”   Reich Greenberg Atlas. “In such a case,   dripping onto the back steps and the con-  dominium board of managers have some   responsibility for addressing the air con-  ditioning–related issue.   “While it would be necessary to review   the condominium bylaws to determine   exactly what they provide with respect to   nuisance behavior, most condominium   bylaws prohibit a resident from doing or   continued on page 14 


































































































   3   4   5   6   7