Page 11 - CooperatorNews NY July 2022
P. 11

COOPERATORNEWS.COM  COOPERATORNEWS —  JULY 2022   11   To get your FREE copy  *  Email: Facades101@gmail.com  FREE  *  for Property   Managers &   Board Members!  Just off the   printing press!  They didn’t teach me   any of this in college,   can I get a refund?  Cesarano & Khan, PC  Certified Public Accountants  PROVIDING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO   THE COOPERATIVE AND CONDOMINIUM COMMUNITY  Reporting on Financial Statements •  Tax Services  Budgeting & Consulting • Election Tabulation Services  For additional information, contact  Carl M. Cesarano, CPA  199 JERICHO TURNPIKE, SUITE 400 • FLORAL PARK, NY 11001  (516) 437-8200  and   718-478-7400 • info@ck-cpas.com  cesarano &khan1_8 use this_:cesarano &khan 4  7/22/15  4:59 PM  Page 1  tion of inconsistent requirements on mu-  nicipalities such as New York City.  They   also allege that key provisions of LL97 are   vague and ambiguous, making it impos-  sible for owners to reasonably understand   what is required of them and opening the   door for arbitrary enforcement.   Andrew Rudansky, spokesperson for   the New York City Department of Build-  ings (DOB), which is named as a defen-  dant in the case, says that “in NYC, our   buildings are the largest emitter of the   greenhouse  gasses  that  contribute  to  cli-  mate change, and we are committed to ful-  ly enforcing Local Law 97.” He adds that   the DOB has been assembling additional   guidance for property owners regarding   the law and notes that it will respond to   the case after it has been served.  The suit also alleges that since the pen-  alties aren’t earmarked for any specific   environmental  goal,  the  law  actually  op-  erates as an improper tax imposed by the   City without the necessary authorization   from the State.  “While my clients recognize the issue   of addressing climate change, Local Law   97 does so in name only,” says Randy M.   Mastro, a partner at international law   firm Gibson, Dunn, & Crutcher LLP and   lead counsel for the plaintiffs. “New York   State  has  already  enacted  a  comprehen-  sive greenhouse emissions law that covers   the field. But the City has massively over-  reached here and far exceeded its consti-  tutional and statutory authority with this   Local Law, which will only make New   York City less affordable, drive out essen-  tial businesses, and unfairly penalize own-  ers who have always complied with appli-  cable emissions laws, only to now face this   onerous new City law.”   SAFER in Condos Act Proposes HUD   Loans for Structural Repairs  U.S. Representatives Charlie Crist (D-  Fla.) and Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-  Fla.) introduced the Securing Access to   Financing for Exterior Repairs (SAFER) in   Condos Act earlier this year, in response   to the catastrophic condo collapse in Surf-  side, Florida in June 2021 that killed 98   people. Described as “legislation that will   make it easier for condominium owners   to afford special assessments for structural   and safety repairs,” the Act proposes low-  interest loans to fund repairs through two   programs guaranteed by the U.S. Depart-  ment of Housing and Urban Development   (HUD).  Multifamily housing advocacy groups   such as the Community Associations In-  stitute (CAI) were involved in crafting and   championing the legislation and praise its   introduction.  “Since the tragic condo-  minium collapse in Surfside, Florida,” says   Thomas M. Skiba, CAE, CAI’s chief execu-  tive officer, “CAI has worked closely with   state and federal lawmakers to introduce   critical legislation  that  supports condo-  minium safety for the millions of people   who call these communities home. We are   pleased that Reps. Crist and Wasserman  ed the condo only half that amount—just   Shultz have introduced this impactful leg-  islation that helps us honor the memories  Attorneys for the association moved to add   of the 98 people who lost their lives last  prejudgment interest to the award, which   June and will help prevent another trag-  edy. We’re hopeful that the bill moves for-  ward expeditiously.”  In a press statement, Rep. Wasserman  pealed and was granted 12% simple inter-  Shultz  says,  “While we  still  mourn all  est by the Massachusetts Court of Appeals,   those we lost in Surfside, the harsh real-  ity is that untold numbers of aging con-  dos just like Champlain Towers South may  since 2012.  face similar structural safety  problems…   This legislation that Congressman Charlie  according to the   Crist is leading will take meaningful steps   to help prevent that from ever happening  mediation” phase of cleanup at the site,   again by helping make it easier for condo  according to  senior environmental  plan-  owners to afford special assessments when  ner Sarah Brown, followed by a plan for   costly structural and safety repairs arise.”   Condo’s 10-Yr Legal Battle Against   Lowell, MA Nears End  Grand Manor Condominiums in Low-  ell, Massachusetts, was built in the 1980s.  be the next step,” Brown tells the   According to reporting in the   Lowell Sun,   residents there were unawar that they  we were going to conduct that sampling.   e   were living on top of a municipal landfill  Once we install the system, we have to   dating to the 1940s and 1950s until a 2008  get it started first and we have to see what   drainage system installation at the site.  those initial results are first before we de-  Only then was it discovered that the prop-  erty’s soil contained hazardous materials  ing to entail.”  including lead and arsenic.   In 2009, according to the   Sun  , the state   Department of Environmental Protection   declared the city of Lowell to be respon-  sible for the cleanup as well as for the de-  crease in home values at Grand Manor.  fectively extends the time that planned   The condo association then sued the city  real estate development associations—in-  for that loss in 2012. A trial began in 2016  cluding condos and co-ops—have to file   after the parties could not reach an out-of-  court settlement.    The  jury  in  that  trial  sided  with  the  to the date that the owners/shareholders   city, saying that the statute of limitations  take control of the board, rather than the   had  expired.  The  condo  association  ap-  pealed in 2017, claiming that it had filed  velopment.   its  suit  well  within the  statutory period.   The  Supreme  Judicial  Court  agreed  and  New Jersey Supreme Court decision in   remanded the case back to the Lowell Su-  perior Court for another trial in 2018.    In that trial, the association sought $2.8  ment echoes similar legislation making   million in property damages associated  its way through the Massachusetts Leg-  with the reduced home values due to be-  ing situated on hazardous soil. Although  Roundup (https://cooperatornews.com/  the jury sided with the plaintiffs, it award-  over $1.4 million, according to the   Sun.  would accrue since the trial began in 2012.   While the court accepted the city’s motion   to deny that interest, Grand Manor ap-  meaning that the 31 plaintiffs will receive   an additional $170,346 for every trial year   A final court order is expected soon,   Sun.   Meanwhile, Lowell is in its “final re-  routine soil sampling.   “We have to go through a public pro-  curement process here at the city, we have   to put the project out to bid, so that will   Sun  . “We   actually haven’t discussed how frequently   termine what our sampling program is go-   Defect Statute of Limitations    Extended in NJ  Early in the year, Governor Phil Mur-  phy signed into law an amendment to the   New Jersey Statute of Limitations that ef-  certain claims against developers. Specifi-  cally, it sets the start of the six-year clock   date of substantial completion of the de-   Thought to be a reaction to the 2017   Palisades at Fort Lee Condominium Associ-  ation v. 100 Old Palisade, LLC,   the amend-  islature,  as mentioned  in  our 2021  Legal   article/legal-legislative-roundup).  The  Palisades   decision set substantial comple-  tion as the date by which the six-year ac-  crual starts, but also applied the discovery   rule to such cases, meaning that the date   on which any owner—even if it is the de-  veloper—knew or should have known of   the defect would begin the accrual, even   if the subsequent owner did not learn of   the defect until a later date. This effectively   shortened the time the unit-owner-con-  trolled association had to file suit.    Now that the law in New Jersey tolls   the statute of limitations on a defect claim   to when the unit owners take control of   the board, “it’s a real sea change,” says   Scott Piekarsky, partner at  Hackensack   law firm Phillips Nizer LLP. “This amend-  ment really  benefits community associa-  tions and owners. Of course, it doesn’t af-  fect a case that was already subjected to a   final judgment, a dismissal,” he continues,   “and we still do have out there this 10-year   construction statute of repose, which pro-  vides that all construction defect claims   must be brought within 10 years of sub-  stantial completion. You might have some   interplay—that’ll remain to be seen—but   this new legislation now signed into law   is a terrific thing for communities in this   state.”   n   Darcey Gerstein is Associate Editor and a   Staff Writer for CooperatorNews.


































































































   9   10   11   12   13