Page 2 - CooperatorNews NY February 2022
P. 2

2 COOPERATORNEWS —  FEBRUARY 2022  COOPERATORNEWS.COM  responsibilities as a manager in a rental   building are basically the same as they   are in a condo building. The difference   is that in a rental building, “I have one   contact person—the landlord, whereas in   a condo,” in which each unit is individually   owned, “I often have multiple contact   persons.” While having one contact person   is clearly simpler than having dozens or   even hundreds, the day-to-day operational   and administrative tasks needed to keep a   building or association running smoothly  a condo or co-op community directly from   don’t necessarily change with scale.  the rental market, bringing their ‘tenant   “Overall,” Wolf explains, “the nature of the  mentality’  with them. This  often leads  to   work remains the same.”  Not My Job  Of course, the average shareholder  is responsible for what kinds of repairs,   or unit owner is likely not well-versed in  maintenance, and other property-related   the legal distinctions between rental and  tasks.   owner-occupied multifamily properties.   Indeed, despite it likely being the single  HOA, often the unit owner must take   biggest investment in their portfolio, most  on responsibilities that would fall to the   purchasers of co-op and condo apartments  landlord in a rental setting. Wollman   don’t take the time to read the governing  breaks it down: “In both ownership   documents of the building they’re moving  structures,  property  owners and boards   into. Additionally, many owners come into  are responsible for maintenance of   misunderstandings between residents and   their board-management teams about who   In the context of a co-op, condo, or   the  common elements.  In rentals,   all  interior  operations—including  painting, plumbing, and appliances like   garbage disposals, dishwashers, etc.—  are the landlord’s responsibility. In a   condominium or a co-op, unit owners   and shareholders—not the association   or corporation—are responsible for the   unit interiors, including those internal   components.”  As with most things, there  are   exceptions to that general rule, in which   division of responsibility can get a little   blurry. One such case is original fixtures   and components in co-ops. According   to Wollman, “Typically in a co-op, the   building is responsible for the floors,   ceilings, and walls that are original to the   building. So, if there’s damage to your   parquet floor that was put down when   the building was built, the corporation is   responsible for repairing it. It’s like no-fault   insurance—how the floor was damaged   is unimportant. But if you renovated   the unit and put in a new floor and that    is damaged, you as the shareholder are   responsible for its repair.”  “As property managers, we often must   communicate the difference between an   individual shareholders’ or unit owners’   responsibility versus the corporation’s   or association’s responsibility when   conducting  and  paying  for  repairs,”  says   Anthony Colon, a management executive   with AKAM management, which has   offices in New York and Florida. “While   repairs inside an apartment are typically   the unit shareholder’s responsibility,   there are nuances within each governing   document  that may provide  further   clarity. Situations can get complicated,   especially with shared walls and pipes,   and some residential communities have   limited common areas, such as private   patios on a shared rooftop, that can create   further confusion when determining   responsible parties. We must understand   these differences to adequately explain   and enforce the policies.”    Tenant Mentality  As mentioned previously, many condo   and co-op owners are coming from   years of living in rental units. Even after   making the jump to ownership, they often   equate their monthly fees or maintenance   payment with ‘rent,’ and think of the board   as their ‘landlord.’ They don’t understand   what their responsibilities are as owners,   and assume  that  the board  should take   care of everything in their apartment. For   example, say a shareholder has a leak in   their kitchen sink—but that sink features   a $1,000 faucet, and the super doesn’t want   to work on it for fear of damaging it.  The   shareholder may become angry and argue   that they pay maintenance every month,   and are therefore entitled to repairs—but   that’s not how it works, says Wolf.   To head off such conflicts, Colon says,   BOARDS, MANAGERS...  continued from page 1  continued on page 6 


































































































   1   2   3   4   5