Page 5 - CooperatorNews New York August 2021
P. 5

COOPERATORNEWS.COM  COOPERATORNEWS —  AUGUST 2021    5  QUESTIONS & ANSWERS  Legal  Q  A&  Buyer’s Remorse  Q  I signed a contract at the end of   November 2020. There was an   increase in the maintenance in   February 2021, so it’s likely they got no-  tice of this in December. Unfortunately   I wasn’t given notice of this $55 increase   per month until three business days be-  fore  my  closing.  When  I  was  consider-  ing apartments I didn’t want to go over a   certain sum in maintenance, and the in-  crease takes me past that limit. Do I have   any recourse since they did not inform   me about this change?                                         —Seeking Redress  A  “When purchasing a co-  operative apartment,” says   Cathleen Hung, attorney at   the New York office of law firm Anderson   Kill, “one of the things you will see listed   on the first page of your contract is the   amount of monthly maintenance you are   expected to pay for the apartment. How-  ever, there is a period of time between   when you sign the contract and when   you actually close on the apartment. Any   maintenance amount set forth in the con-  tract is based on the current number as   of the date you execute the contract, and   there is no guarantee that it will be the   same amount by the time you get to clos-  ing. And there is little to no recourse even   if the Seller failed to notify you of the new   maintenance increase, especially since the   accuracy of the maintenance amount can   be verified by pre-contract due diligence.    “Since you signed your contract in   November  2020  and the  maintenance   increase was implemented in February   2021,  there must  have been  some  indi-  cation that a maintenance increase was   on the horizon. Before you signed your   contract, your attorney would have done   his/her due diligence on the cooperative.   That would involve reviewing the board   minutes and/or having the managing   agent answer a questionnaire that in-  cludes whether any future maintenance   increase was under discussion. Either op-  tion would have provided you with notice   that a maintenance increase was in the   works.   “Unless  your  contract  specifically  in-  cludes a provision that gives you the right   to terminate the contract if the mainte-  nance is increased above a certain amount   prior to closing, there is not much you   can do other than back out of the deal   and lose your contract deposit. To the   contrary, most contracts I have seen in-  clude a rider that states that the Seller will   notify the Purchaser if the Seller receives   notice of a maintenance increase, but this   is done only as a courtesy and shall have   no effect on the Purchaser’s obligation to   close on the apartment.”  Dangerous Mitchell-Lama Resident   Q  I have lived in a Mitchell-Lama   co-op since 1992 and never re-  ceived a copy of the complete   house rules. I have been assaulted by a   neighbor’s husband; he is not a tenant on   record yet  lives  here  and  is  a  very dan-  gerous person. Does the Department of   Housing Preservation and Development   (HPD) investigate the background for all   family members before granting approv-  al? And is the resident required to show   his income to HPD?                        —Looking for Background  A  Dov Treiman, managing   partner in the landlord-  tenant division of New   York law firm Adam Leitman Bailey, P.C.,   says, “In a Mitchell-Lama cooperative,   HPD does not do background checks on   family members at any time. It is entirely   up to the cooperative board to determine   what kinds of background checks they do   and do not want to do before processing   purchase applications. Since cooperatives   are actually landlord-tenant relationships   (appearances to the contrary notwith-  standing), the new laws passed in 2019   severely constrict the fees that Mitchell-  Lama cooperatives can charge for these   checks. While few boards did background   checks  on  family  members  even  before   these laws, the $20 limitation on fees   the board can charge makes such checks   prohibitively expensive, especially in  a   Mitchell-Lama development, where there   are serious restrictions on how expensive   the facility can be and how much money   the board can gather for its needs.  “Annually, each Mitchell-Lama coop-  erator must report to the board the to-  tal household income for those who are   living in  the  apartment.  Failure to  do   so can result in serious increases to the   maintenance fees the board charges for   the apartment, sometimes pentuple what   the normal maintenance is. Failure to re-  port these sums accurately is grounds for   evicting a cooperator, although the Hous-  ing Court usually allows late filings to   correct matters. However, fraudulent fil-  ings are generally not forgiven.  continued on page 5   “FirstService Residential has been our   managing agent for decades. Whether finance,   day-to-day problems or getting through a   big capital project, the team shows up with   great ideas and solutions. Our property   manager’s leadership, coupled with the rest   of our FirstService Residential team, makes   our staff and our board function better. The   email I just received from FirstService Energy   double assured me that being under the big   FirstService Residential umbrella is the only   way to go. I sent it out to everyone on the board   telling them the same.”   >> Stephanie G., Board President        200+ unit cooperative        Upper East Side  www.fsresidential.com/new-york  LetsTalk.NY@fsresidential.com  212.324.9944  New York’s Property   Management Leader  Making a Difference.  Every Day.  continued on page 12 


































































































   3   4   5   6   7