Page 7 - CooperatorNews July 2021
P. 7

COOPERATORNEWS.COM 
COOPERATORNEWS — 
JULY 2021   
7 
Paving The Way... 
• Concrete Specialists 
• Decorative Sidewalks 
• Color Tinting 
• Stamping 
• Acid Stain 
• Structural Steel 
• Waterproofing 
• Fireproofing 
• Landmark Buildings 
• Parking Garages 
• Structural Concrete 
• Granite & Brick Pavers 
• Caulking 
• Granite Curbing 
• Steel Face Curbing 
• Sidewalk Violations Removed 
Serving Manhattan for over 40 Years 
Approved 
Phone: 718-858-4668 
Fax: 718-243-9354 
171 Dwight Street 
Brooklyn, NY 11231 
www.EtnaContracting.com 
ECI 
Since 1966 
CONTRACTING INC. 
Complete Restorations & Rebuilding of Sidewalk Vaults 
Certified Waterproofing Systems: 
Kemper 
Liquid Plastics 
Siplast 
WR Grace 
BIC # 2562  
Consumer Affairs #11335626 
Co-Chair of the Brooklyn Mitchell-Lama  Member of Mitchell-Lama United, “When  
Task Force, Mitchell-United, Cooperators  a Mitchell-Lama cooperative leaves the  
United  For  Mitchell-Lama,  Lindsay  Park  program and becomes a private for-profit  
Housing Co-op, says, “The provisions in  entity, a select few people walk away with  
A7272/S6412 will help us address some  a windfall profit. Everybody else in New  
of the issues that we have been trying to  York  State loses. Mitchell-Lama coopera- 
get addressed for many, many years, such  tives are the product of substantial public  
as the misuse of proxies, corruption, lack  investments in the form of low-cost land,  
of transparency, and non-supervision of  low- or no-interest mortgages, and decades  
boards of directors. We lobbied in Albany  of abated real estate taxes. The taxpayers of  
for many, many years to  get policies  and  New  York,  who  in  the  final  analysis  have  
legislation to help us address these issues  all contributed to Mitchell-Lamas all over  
confronting shareholders and renters to no  the State for the purpose of creating and  
avail, but thanks to Assemblywoman Linda  sustaining affordable housing for working  
Rosenthal and Senator Brian Kavanagh— 
our unwavering supporters of Mitchell- 
Lamas—we can see a light at the end of the  ed which represents those thousands of  
tunnel.”   
Christine Fowley, founding member of  ed a campaign to make sure that social and  
Committee to Preserve Cadman Towers,  economic justice—the ideals baked into the  
Cooperators United for Mitchell-Lama,  Mitchell-Lama program—triumph over in- 
and Mitchell-Lama United, adds that the  dividual selfishness and greed.”  
bill “helps to correct many of the outra- 
geous problems we have seen when a pro- 
privatization board of directors moves to  nor Cuomo signs A.7272/S.6412 into law,  
take  a  development  out  of the program,  I believe it will be the most important  
and it makes the process harder by raising  Mitchell-Lama legislation since 1955, when  
the vote percentage to be more in sync with  Governor Averill Harriman signed the  
other similar votes in publicly supported  Mitchell-Lama program into law.”               
housing.”  
According to Richard Heitler, Presi- 
dent of the Board of Village East Towers,  
Board Member of Cooperators United for  
Mitchell-Lama, and Steering Committee  
families, lose their entire investment. I am  
proud to be part of Mitchell-Lama Unit- 
Mitchell-Lama residents and have mount- 
Adds Sharon Torres, a shareholder of  
Cadman Towers in Brooklyn: “If Gover- 
n 
MITCHELL-LAMA... 
continued from page 6 
dollars on an attorney or an accountant and  enough attention to the division of respon- 
expect top shelf service.” 
According to Karen Sackstein, principal  associations.   
with The Condo Queens, an accounting firm  
in New Jersey, “Financial leakage can come  that owners should pay for and it’s not billed  
from two directions: the income side, and  back correctly, we have substantial and costly  
the expense side. On the income side, asso- 
ciations sometimes absorb costs that really are  ties such as water and sewer, electric and gas,  
the responsibility of individual unit owners.  as well as other issues with recording those  
This is more common in high-rise buildings.  billings; are you being charged correctly? In  
Associations should always look at their gov- 
erning  documents  to  determine  what  their  bill in one building we manage. It wasn’t clear  
common elements are, what the association  if it was a leak or there was a problem with  
is responsible for maintaining and repairing,  the meter. We had the meter recalibrated, and  
and what should be paid for by owners.”  
That said, Sackstein continues, “The larger  turns out that was the source of the actual  
piece of the puzzle is on the expenditure side.  physical water leak that led to the financial  
Contracted vendors may be performing ad- 
ditional work and charging for it—and that  
should be covered under the contract. It’s  
critically important to be specific in contracts  
so you don’t get overcharged. Another area to  
consider is competitive bidding. If you’ve had  
a contractor for a long time, check the market.  
Are you getting maximum services at the best  
price? Every so often, go out into the market  
to check bids.” 
Dan  Wollman,  CEO  of  Gumley  Haft,  a  
Manhattan based co-op and condo manage- 
ment firm, adds that “leakage occurs when we  
spend more than we budget for or anticipate.  
Waste can figure in when we overuse sup- 
plies, for instance.” He points out that leakage  
also  occurs  when  management  isn’t  paying  
sibility between owners and corporations or  
“When we do work within apartments  
leakage,” Wollman says. “There are also utili- 
one case,” he says, “we had an excessive water  
then found a leak in the condensate tank. It  
leakage.” 
Audits 
The best way to determine if your prop- 
erty is suffering from financial leakage is to  
complete a thorough audit of your financial  
records. “We look at it from two perspectives,”  
says Zanjirian. “The first is at what the pro- 
jected or expected amount of an item was— 
or what it should have been—and if it’s out of  
line with projections. If it is, we go to deter- 
mine why. Let’s say a project should have cost  
‘X’ dollars, but it cost 10 percent more—or  
WHERE DOES IT GO? 
continued from page 1 
continued on page 8 
   5   6   7   8   9