Page 7 - CooperatorNews July 2021
P. 7

COOPERATORNEWS.COM 
COOPERATORNEWS — 
JUNE 2021   
7 
LEGAL & LEGISLATIVE... 
continued from page 1 
continued on page 8  
ROSENWACH TANK 
THE FIRST NAME IN QUALITY CEDAR WOOD TANKS 
WE ARE CERTIFIED and IT MATTERS! 
718.729.4900  
43-02 Ditmars Boulevard, 2nd Fl., Astoria, NY 11105 
www.rosenwachgroup.com 
Rosenwach is proud to announce that Rosenwach’s tanks are certified to NSF/ANSI 61 by NSF  
International, a leading global independent public health and safety organization. NSF/ANSI 61  
addresses crucial aspects of drinking water system components such as whether contaminants  
that leach or migrate from the product/material into the drinking water are below acceptable levels  
in finished waters. 
To receive certification, Rosenwach Tank submitted product samples to NSF that underwent rigorous  
testing to recognized standards, and agreed to manufacturing facility audits and periodic retesting  
to verify continued conformance to the standards. 
The NSF mark is our customers’ assurance that our prod- 
uct has been tested by one of the most respected indepen- 
dent certification organizations. Only products bearing the  
NSF mark are certified. 
and violations” but that “there’s a rebuttable  
presumption in this law, that the failure to pay  
rent is not good cause if it results from a rent  
increase of more than 3%, or one-and-a-half  
times the increase in consumer price index  
(CPI).” 
As such, with passage of this bill co-ops  
would not be able to increase their mainte- 
nance charges more than 3% or one-and-a- 
half times the increase in CPI in a given year.  
“This effectively prohibits co-ops and condos  
from enforcing maintenance or common  
charge increases that are over these kept fig- 
ures,” says Weinstein, “even if they have vastly  
increasing operating costs or tax increases  
or other obligations—such as all the carbon  
emission control rules that they have to now  
comply with.” The vast majority of co-ops do  
not have other means of raising funds to op- 
erate their properties, so without being able to  
adjust carrying charges to meet rising costs,  
many co-ops will be hard pressed to meet  
their expenses if this bill passes. 
Weinstein adds that the bill also pertains  
to renewal leases and subleases, which might  
have  consequences  for individual  condo  
owners who rent out their units. “You can’t  
recapture individual units, except for quote- 
unquote ‘good cause,’” she adds. “So let’s say  
you lease your unit out. You may not be able  
to take it back.”  
In short, she says, “this bill could severely  
restrict the board in maintaining its build- 
ing, and will prevent individual unit owners  
as well from renting their apartments on a  
short-term basis and getting those apart- 
ments back. So I think it has detrimental po- 
tential on multiple levels to affect the housing  
supply and the ways in which a co-op or a  
condominium currently operates.” 
Reason for Rejection   
Another swath of legislation getting a  
lot of attention in New York are Senate bills  
1449, 2846, and 2874, which deal with boards  
disclosing a reason for rejecting a co-op or  
condo purchase applicant, and the timing for  
doing so. Weinstein says that these types of  
bills have reached the legislature every couple  
of years for the last decade or so, “and they  
usually just don’t go anywhere. … [but] this  
year, there are three of these bills in the Senate  
that seem to show some movement.” 
With the ostensible purpose of provid- 
ing transparency and eliminating the po- 
tential for discrimination, the bills would  
require boards of co-ops to provide a writ- 
ten explanation for their rejection of a pro- 
spective buyer, rather than the current lee- 
way boards have to reject an applicant “for  
any reason, or for no reason.” 
But Philip Simpson, an attorney with  
Robinson Brog, a firm also based in New  
York, points out that “New York City pres- 
ently has the broadest scope of protection  
for groups of people against whom co-op  
boards might discriminate. If a prospec- 
tive purchaser in a protected class is turned  
down and sues, the co-op board may well  
have to articulate a reason in response to  
the lawsuit.” 
Aside from that apparent redundancy of  
the bill, boards have the fiduciary responsi- 
bility to protect the assets of their commu- 
nity and the investments of their individual  
shareholders. In fact, attorneys represent- 
ing both co-op corporations and prospec- 
tive shareholders advise that the most  
common reason for denial is the financial  
position of the applicant. Since cooperators  
in a housing corporation share financial re- 
sponsibility for the operation and upkeep  
of the property, it is particularly impor- 
tant for incoming shareholders to be able  
to contribute proportionally now and for  
the foreseeable future. Similarly, Simpson  
also says that he has “seen denials, or issues  
raised, when the board views the purchase  
price as too low. A low purchase price will  
affect values throughout the building, be- 
cause it will become a comparable sale the  
next time an apartment comes on the mar- 
ket, or someone wants to refinance their  
unit’s mortgage.” 
One of these bills that Weinstein sees  
as particularly problematic says that if the  
board doesn’t act within a certain period  
of time, the board is deemed to have con- 
sented to the applicant. She points to the  
effect this would have on financing, ques- 
tioning whether mortgage lenders would  
accept such tacit consent without seeing  
it in writing. Similarly for the issuance of  
a cooperative’s title insurance. “Yeah,” says  
Weinstein, “I think both title policies and  
lenders are  going  to  want  the  affirmative  
consent. And the board might refuse to is- 
sue that affirmative consent. So then where  
are we?” 
Construction Defect Claims  
Matthew Gaines, attorney with Braintree,  
Massachusetts-based law firm Marcus, Erri- 
co, Emmer, and Brooks, P.C. and co-chair of  
the Community Associations Institute’s New  
England Chapter’s (CAI-NE’s) Legislative Ac- 
tion Committee, explains that January began  
the legislative session for Massachusetts’ two- 
year legislative cycle; all bills have been filed  
and referred to their respective committee,  
awaiting hearings that will take place in the  
upcoming year or so. 
   5   6   7   8   9