Page 18 - CooperatorNews NY January 2021
P. 18

18 COOPERATORNEWS —  JANUARY 2021   COOPERATORNEWS.COM  ATTORNEYS  Abrams Garfi nkel Margolis Bergson, LLP  1430 Broadway,  17th Floor, New York, NY 10018  212-201-1170 • www.agmblaw.com  Barry G. Margolis, Esq. • Robert J. Bergson, Esq.  Himmelfarb & Sher, LLP • (914) 682-0040  Cooperative and Condominium Law—Real Estate Closings  One North Broadway, Suite 800, White Plains, NY 10601    Contact: Ronald A. Sher, Esq. • Norman D. Himmelfarb, Esq.  Law@himmelfarb-sher.com • Direct Dial: 914-461-0220  Belkin Burden Wenig & Goldman, LLP  Specializing in all aspects of Cooperative and Condominium  Law including Landlord/tenant proceedings.  Copy of Monthly Newsletter available upon request.  (212) 867-4466 contact: Aaron Shmulewitz/Daniel Altman  ashmulewitz@bbwg.com/daltman@bbwg.com   www.bbwg.com  ACCOUNTANTS  ARCHITECTS  architecture  interior design  engineering  project management  forensic investigations  307 7th Avenue, Suite 1001, New York, NY 10001  Tel. 212.645.3775 Fax. 212.645.4099  Form Space Image ARCHITECTURE PC  SERVICE DIRECTORY  Disclaimer: Th  e answers provided in this Q&A   column are of a general nature and cannot   substitute for professional advice regarding your   specifi c circumstances. Always seek the advice of   competent legal counsel or other qualifi ed profes-  sionals with any questions you may have regard-  ing technical or legal issues.  Please submit Pulse items to  Darcey Gerstein at  darcey@cooperatornews.com    Do you have   an issue with   your board? Are you wondering   how to solve a dispute with a   neighbor? Can’t fi nd informa-  tion you need about a build-  ing’s fi nances? Our attorney   advisors have the answers to all   of your legal questions. Write   to CooperatorNews and we’ll   publish your question, along   with a response from one of our   attorney advisors. Questions may   be edited for taste, length and   clarity. Send your questions to:   darcey@cooperatornews.com.  Q&A    Over 30 years of coop & condo experience    Hands on Personal Attention  Timely Service    Contact:  Gary Adler, CPA    Sarah Haar CPA      www.bassandlemer.com  516-485-9600  adler@basslemer.com  ceiling windows, remote  control  window   screens, antimicrobial quartz countertops,   and Bosch appliances, including in-unit   washer and dryers. Building wide ameni-  ties include a rooft op deck and a full gym,   both welcoming spaces when the pandem-  ic recedes.  Th  e building is conveniently located just   four blocks from the waterfront, with easy   access to community gems like the Socrates   Sculpture Garden, Noguchi Museum, and   Rainey Park, and is an easy walk to the 30th   Ave subway station and the Astoria Ferry   Terminal, providing easy access to Manhat-  tan.  And that’s to say nothing of the well-  known  Greek  restaurant  community  for   which the neighborhood is known.  “Th  e Ely off ers amenities today’s buyers   consider ‘must-haves’, such as private out-  door space and in-unit laundry facilities,”   says Kyroglou, “and boast windows that   off er an abundance of natural light on all   sides of the building. In-unit washer/dry-  ers have been a huge draw for owners given   COVID-related health and safety concerns.   Th  ere were more than 30 potential buyers   waiting for a peek at the project back in   September.  Astoria’s real estate market is   continuing to rise and the Ely is leading the   way.”    ■  ASTORIA CONDO...  continued from page 6  board members, or how they voted on   decisions. They are so skimpy that future   board members will never know histori-  cally what previous boards did, and why   they did it. I believe boards do this on le-  gal advice, to avoid any possible liability.   Is that the reason, or what else could it   be? Boards have gone too far with sani-  tizing, in my view.  —Discontented with Minute Minutes   Content   A  “The questioner’s strongly   expressed opinions on this   subject are entirely under-  standable,” says Stanley Kaufman,  part-  ner at real estate law firm Kaufman Fried-  man Plotnicki & Grun, LLP in New York   City. “Cooperative shareholders want full   transparency from their elected boards,   and it is not uncommon for sharehold-  ers to be dissatisfied with the level of dis-  closure reflected in board meeting min-  utes. It is not wrong for shareholders to   complain about the level of disclosure, or   vote at the next annual meeting to elect   new board members who promise to   conduct the cooperative’s business with   more transparency. However, there are   legitimate reasons why a board may want   to keep its meeting minutes ‘sparse’ and   ‘skimpy.’ Before I discuss some of these   reasons, I will address the legal require-  ments for the content of board meeting   minutes.  “New York’s Business Corporation   Law (BCL), which applies to the gover-  nance of most cooperatives, contains no   express requirements for the content of   meeting minutes. A cooperative’s bylaws   could contain such requirements, but   that would be uncommon. Under most   cooperative bylaws, it is the duty of the   cooperative’s secretary to keep the min-  utes—although  in  practice,  this  duty  is   sometimes delegated to the co-op’s man-  aging agent.   “The absence of any  explicit  provi-  sions in the law regarding what minutes   must  contain  does  not  mean  that  there   are no implicit requirements. BCL 708   requires that actions by the board of a   corporation must be taken at a meet-  ing (except when the board members   unanimously consent in writing to the   adoption of a resolution). Thus, actions   taken by a board at a meeting should be   reflected in the meeting minutes. For ex-  ample, if the board votes to adopt a new   house rule, to approve an alteration, or to   accept or reject a purchase application,   that action (but not necessarily how each   board member voted) should be reflected   in the minutes.    “Indeed, as a practical matter, if the   board takes an action that is not reflected   in the minutes, and the board later seeks   to rely upon that action or that action   is later challenged, the board could face   difficulty  proving  the  action  was  taken.   For example, if a board seeks to enforce   a shareholder’s obligation to comply with   a board-imposed  house rule (assuming   that the board is otherwise authorized   to take these actions), it likely will need   to have evidence that the house rule was   duly adopted, and the meeting minutes   will consist of such evidence.  “Beyond these minimal requirements,   however, the amount of detail to include   in board meeting minutes is a matter en-  tirely within the board’s discretion. And   there are certainly reasonable policy   reasons for keeping meeting minutes as   bare-boned  as  possible.  It  is  generally   considered good practice not to include   disclosure of how individual directors   vote on particular matters or the specific   nature and content of the board’s delib-  erations. Disclosing such votes or pro-  viding details of board discussions and   possible disagreements may make certain   directors targets of those with opposing   views, and might inhibit board discus-  sions. Boards and their individual mem-  bers are sometimes sued for myriad rea-  sons, such as unlawful discrimination or   breach of fiduciary duty. Board meeting   minutes are not considered to be confi-  dential or privileged; thus, in a litigation,   they are fully discoverable. The inclusion   of too much detail in the meeting min-  Q&A  continued from page 5  utes—such as the casual musings of indi-  vidual board members, or who said what   to whom at the meeting—could turn out   to be a recipe for disaster in a litigation   brought years later.    “Meeting minutes also are customar-  ily  reviewed by  prospective  purchasers   or their counsel as part of the pre-con-  tract due diligence process. While meet-  ing minutes should not contain content   that is in any way false or misleading, a   board may not want to go out of its way   to unnecessarily highlight problems that   might make it more difficult for the coop-  erative’s shareholders to market and sell   their apartments. So while the amount   of detail to include in the minutes is a   matter within the board’s discretion, the   maxim ‘less is better’ is the advice usually   given to boards.”    ■  rior and exterior to “celebrate the heritage”   of Brooklyn Heights. Colberg Architecture is   the Project Architect for Th  e Symon.   Th  e Symon’s amenity off erings include a   hotel-like private lounge; a lushly landscaped   rooft op terrace with panoramic harbor and   city vistas; a state-of-the-art gym; and a chil-  dren’s playroom. A limited number of on-site   private, indoor automatic parking spots are   available for purchase in addition to bicycle   spaces and storage.   ■  PULSE  continued from page 4


































































































   16   17   18   19   20